On the page "The Insight" we raise some of the concluding inferences of this book. In a simplified way, we try to introduce the key insights for an integrated vision of an universal creative process and its meaning, namely, the role of life and humans.

​

It is an intuitive skeleton that, in the book, reveals its inner life and finds its foundation, in a detailed, thorough and gradual path of reflection and insight, where is generated the different descriptions's integrating point of view, clarifying the reflexive/creative process particularities and opening us to the nature of this process.

This is an important aspect of the book, which is not exactly bringing information within an informative relation mode, conditioned by the assumptions of this or that area or by a posture that already knows where it will go, but generating a reflexive/creative relation from what is present, which allows the understanding and experiencing of this process and, therefore, to continue it. It is this mode of relation that generates the little mythologies, trying to maintain itself in the creative life of this process.

In the book, one of the first conclusive inferences we reach, and will be the basic perspective, points to the fact that meaning depends on the mode of relation. After we integrate quantum physics, life and the conscious process, etc. this point of view arrives at the understanding that this process is like a text, where the conscience, or the nature of the creative, expresses itself depending on the aspects and relational forces that, “on the surface”, collapse a final realization. It is the old question of the transition from creative potential or inspiration to realization, and the artistic wisdom that realizes it, but also the difficulty of translating the transformation into words, the impossibility of describing the creative, of  “blocking” its potential when we do or even, from the non-nomination or representation of the divine.

We never get out of the creative, because it it is our nature, but we live within regimes of collapse that express it in a more limited or even distorted way. So, if the universe is a creative process, then, to understand it, we have to approach it as such and find a way to come into phase with it, which a priori is difficult to establish, without opening up to fantasy or to deterministic closures. Therefore, to carry out this investigation it was necessary an involvement that assumed all kinds of scientific descriptions, in their particular ways of framing the real and relational conditioning, but kept the process open to its creative nature, so that the resolutions could come from the freedom of this nature .

At the beginning of the investigation I realized that, in moments of rest, as the body was pacifying and reaching a more subtle integration, the different theses, with their difficulties and partialities, entered a spontaneous reflexive/creative becoming, in phase with the body, which generated very clarifying resolutive intuitions. This led to the inference that reflection needs a more or less clean biological "mirror" or, in that state of integration and, therefore, in those moments, biology was solving the theses in its nature or adjusting them to the integrated reality of this creative process.

 

That is, biology was creating the book's solutions and, gradually, I learned to be in a "biological" thinking that kept the theses in that relational zone of good integration, in a joint meditation, allowing partialities and incompatibilities to be solved by its wisdom.

​

With the evolution, due to the practice of yoga, meditation and, in particular, the reflexive training of non-duality, it became easier to stay in the integrative, poetic or non-dualistic zone, where all topics are solved. Later on, the reason for this simplicity was clarified in the non-dualistic nature of biological cycles, namely of total integration, such as those of sleep, as well as in the non-dualistic nature of the quantum plane and in particular the non-duality that defines the space beyond the sizes of the elementary orders.

​

Therefore, while investigating the different areas, I was experiencing a personal reflective/creative process that was expressing its operating mode and the methodologies that deepened it, as well as explaining how the contents of those areas were integrated into the nature of that process, clarifying its universal structure and finding the modes of non-dualistic relationship that brought solutions to the partiality of different points of view. I was in a meditative process and the theses were showing how the universe operates as a meditative process, and solving their particular dualisms.

​

This is the process of the little mythology that, through the wisdom of previous cycles, takes the differentials, separations and partialities to the non-dualistic integration of biology and, with this, is establishing a biological thought or, one in phase with the reflexive/creative process of biology and the universe and, gradually, generating an interface to biological insight. That is, as this process deepens, the dynamics of thought and its contents are in phase with the reality of the universal creative process, so there is no longer a separation between the conscious process and the subtle creative nature of biology and the universe, generating an interface where biological insight or enlightenment can be triggered spontaniously.

​

Despite the personal evolutions, this notion of an interface to biological insight only emerged much later and in a collective sense. That is, my approach was like a prototype with the appropriate mode of relationship, but within the limits of my level of investigation, which, however, found the same meditative process in the stages of universal evolution, in life, conscious process, in the emergence of man, throughout our history and, namely, in the reflexive paths towards non-duality, that the different areas of knowledge have been establishing in the last centuries. Therefore, the time would come when the meditative understanding of reality would be in all fields and a collective interface would be established, triggering the evolutionary stage of biological insight.

​

This book emerges as a prototype for this interface and, therefore, does not start from the final conclusions to establish an argument that justifies them, but tries to recreate the reflexive/creative path that developed throughout the investigation, so that the reader can experience the gradual process that generated the various insights and develop his own training in non-duality and biological thinking.

​

In a relatively simple way, we approach the discourse and problems of different areas of knowledge, going through a path of reflections that lead us to certain conclusive inferences and implications, assumed and used in the following steps to address other themes, which lead us to new understandings and insights, deepening the meaning and coherence of this path, where, gradually, a mode of relation/biological thinking is established and takes all subjects to the solving dynamics of non-duality, realizing their small mythologies.

​

We start by approaching language, which is the most comprehensive theme, as we cannot separate it from the conscious process, and all areas are creating it within their own relational modes. If we understand well language's reflexive/creative process, we will be deepening it in our consciousness and developing the way of relating that allows us to approach all areas in a resolutive sense.

 

The reflection on language begins by raising the question of perspectives's relativity, which is clarified in the fact that they are modes of relationship that mobilize/define the poles of dualities in a particular way. Dualities are the basic elements of the linguistic/conscious process and the construction of the world, so we will find them at all levels. But a duality does not mean separate opposite polarities, this is just a dualistic mode of approaching them. The opposite poles are interdependent, therefore, they define each other through contents that are not fixed but, let's say, are activated by the modes of relationship and their ways of separating them. Thus, the dualities form organic units with reflexive/creative dynamics between the contents of the poles.

 

By assuming the dualities in this way, we are relating to them as they are, which allows us to perceive the dynamics occurring in a situation and the partiality of the relationship mode, so we spontaneously enter the path of the little mythology, which solves it and keep us in the resolutive reflexivity of non-duality.

​

This training of thought sees the conventionality of separations in the usual meanings and keeps us in an organic reflection, that is the appropriate way of relation for approaching all subjects, begining by revealing language as the reflective/creative process of the conscious, that is inseparable from the world, continuing its language and completing it, by understanding it.

​

With this training in the organic resolution of duality (or training in non-duality) we were able to approach the history of physics, from Classical Greece to the present day, as a science of insight, that did solve conventional views of reality, within certain modes of mobilizing dualities, whose evolution did establish its own little mythology or path to non-duality, which is not yet completed, but expresses particularly in quantum physics.

​

The detailed reflection on the discoveries, implications and difficulties of the theory of relativity, quantum physics and the descriptive map of the existing orders, along the sizes of space, allowed us to complete the path of physics to non-duality, within a vision where the later is assumed as part of this map and animates the universal reflective/creative process.

​

This reflection clarifies the details of this (meditative) process operating mode, which is generating little mythologies or non-dualities, in a relational dynamic between creations, where new beings and their evolutions are generated. Everything in the universe seems to settle through inward and ouward interdependent dynamics, which are descents and ascents in the sizes of space. The evaluation of this process in the various evolutionary stages allows us to understand the descents as concentrations, where reflection takes place and a response is established at certain levels of interdependence, becoming the creative model of resolution, which emanates or ascends in sizes, integrating the order of the new beings.

​

Based on this reflective/creative process, which takes place in the descent/ascent of the sizes of space, we were able to approach the next steps and understand the life of the universe, in its path of gradual expression of deeper levels of interdependence or, of its non dualistic wisdom, which is directly actualized in the emergence of life.

 

The particular vision of universal's creative process was first corroborated in stars internal dynamics, which forges the periodic table of elements and a subtle universal desire that mobilizes chemical articulations and, under very special harmonic conditions, can become love and generate life. From here we arrived to a generic harmonic model for the reflexive/creative process that would be at the base of all stages and in particular of life.

​

With this model we approached the local/global meditation that water established in a path to become alive, as well as we understood the process of co-emergence of cell's components and their reflexive/creative dynamics, where they develop rituals of descent/ascent in the space sizes, which establish their functions, as if, concretizing a subtle underlying model and dynamizing an extremely complex meditation. This meditation will generate the organism and the evolution of species, where it manifests its most subtle form, meditating on previous structures, and gradually solving the existential differential that defines living beings, between the subtle integration that sustains life and the structures they assume as answers to deal with all the conditions.

​

This solving path is particularly manifested in the brain, which we address in terms of structure and areas evolution and functions, whose reflexive/creative process is clarified in some detail, allowing to understand the particular contributions and their meditative logic in the interdependence where the relationship between interior and exterior is managed. It is a big meditation, a relational process between living beings, which implies all levels of reality and not just information processing: in the neuron, that meditates in this universal space of descent/ascent, in the brain areas and between them, within an increasingly reflective path, which enriches the conventional specifications of the parts and their history, with the whole of circulation and, gradually opens to a more self-reflective conscious awareness.

Then we return to the matrix of the cell, of DNA, embryology, body, organs, heart, muscle, skin and brain, etc., as well as to the biological cycles, to understand ourselves as organic units of dualities, being solved non dualistically in a meditation at various levels, with day and night stages, which is based on the primordial ritual of life and is behind what we culturally call meditation, whose practice takes conscious dualities and their existential differential to this background process, to solve them and be able to live our ultimate nature; consciousness.

 

All components and their transformative dynamics imply underlying models and reflective/creative exchanges in the sizes of space, as well as holistic dimensions, coordinating and integrating harmonic processes, that point to the most subtle source behind the process of life, the so-called subtle body or, the biological chakras, whose structure, activation sequence, functions and circulation between them are explained with the harmonic model, showing how the evolution of living beings takes place in the sense that all dimensions of life can realize perfectly the wisdom of this universal source and the conscious process achieves its evolution and purpose, that is, to bring the most subtle integration to all levels of the real.

 

With this point of view of the meditative operation of life and its evolutionary meaning, we reach the particularity of the emergence of man, where the more subtle dimension of this meditation, about its structures, which generated evolution, reaches the self-reflective dynamics of the conscious process, and the individuals are able to solve the history of their conditioning, that is, the existential differential and, with that, the history of suffering in life and in the universe.

 

The millions of years of hominid evolution are a path of transformative insight in the biological apparatus and conscious reflexivity, where is clearly expressed a spontaneous meditation on all past structures, culminating in animistic insight or initial enlightenment. Man appears as this illumination of life that evolves in the discovery of the multiple dimensions of the self/world's reflexive/creative process and, gradually, will reach the stage of civilizations. These will raise new insights about this creative process (agricultural, astrological, etc.) and a set of difficulties that place us in a dualization regarding our nature, but also a deeper reflection that will eventually open up to a sense of cultural conventionality, of individual awareness of values, non-duality and its ultimate realization.

 

This stage is clarified through an approach to the cultural maps and particular ways of understanding life on earth and after death: in the Sumerian, Elamite (Iran) and Egyptian civilizations, as well as in the path of the Jews and Indian thought evolution, namely Buddhist.

 

Western thought is approached as a path of reflexive melting pot, which leads to various phases of a globalization process. We assume, as a background, the metaphor of brain meditation, in the sense that different areas (peoples and cultures) bring their views and contributions to a frontal lobe (institutions), where a more or less dualistic solving model is generated, which allows or not the digestion and integration of contributions and, being projected onto them, with more or less wisdom, feeds meditative cycles where, inevitably, we become aware of the conventionality of the structures.

 

We start in Greece and pass by the contexts of the various stages through the particular contributions of philosophers and the most prominent figures. In this journey we see the non-dualistic (Socratic) resolution of wisdom's reflexive love being partially collapsed and assumed in the more dualistic modes of the Platonic rationalism of the I/world or, in the Aristotelian empiricism of the world/I that will be the base duality of all thought, to reconcile on countless levels throughout history, through the vision of the interdependence of the two sides, namely, and in the first place, with the non-duality of Christian revelation. This revelation will be assumed partially, due to the difficulties raised by civilization and its sense of separation and prison on earth, which will become punishing, torturing and self-destructive, leading to the complexity of medieval meditation and historical trauma.

 

From the Renaissance onwards, meditation became more global and, while imposing the force of our dualisms on other peoples, it began to reflect on all levels of conventionality in dualizing structures. This occurred in several dialectical cycles between opposing tendencies, (Enlightenment, Romantics, etc.), where reflexivity is based more on one pole and then on the other, reaching conclusive inferences that establish a minimum common base, from which the oppositions will do or, end up having to do their own self-reflection and gradually showing the partiality of their fixed points.

 

Therefore, despite all the opposing tendencies and fixations of points of view, there is a reflexivity that is generating a path of little mythology, a gradual study of non-duality and, deep down, establishing a meditative sense of reality. To characterize it, we cover several lines of thought's evolution, from the beginning of the XIX century to the present day or, the end of the XX century. And, indeed, we can see the reflection advancing, at different paces, towards approaches that begin to assume their objects in the organic unity of duality and, cyclically, develop a non-dualistic training. In this sense, we go through the reflexive evolutions that occur in the temporal sequence of the main continental philosophers, but also of analytic philosophy. The same for the evolutionary path of art, namely painting. On the other hand, the dualist problematic that founds science and the self-reflection it had to make, in general and in the stages and perspectives of the course of European and American sociology, physics, biology and the various schools of psychology.

 

Despite the forces of reductionism, mechanistic determinism and even a certain inquisitorial rationality, which do not want to see the limits of their relational mode, and express the problematic of dualization or separation, based on critical reason and the will of absolute certainties, generating a chaotic collapse of the reality of the universal reflective/creative process, that becomes just an algorithm built by chance from randomness, where life is a mechanism to manipulate, without a meaning beyond the maintenance of survival and present satisfaction, therefore, without a future, and the cerebral and world meditation an information processing where everything is relatively partial, dependent on interests and algorithms, etc.

 

Despite all this and many other collapsing aspects, there is a reflexive response to these trends that takes place in all areas, in an increasingly rich and specialized way, where all conceptual closures are being relativized and, whether we like it or not, it expresses the wisdom of non-duality, built on the paths of history, and its relational force, empty, but full of meaning and indestructible.

 

Taking into account the reflexive evolution in different fields of knowledge and the cycles of society from the 60s onwards, namely the reflective process of the current stage which, from different points of view, more or less spiritual, focuses on the logic of insight and awakening; as well as the meditative view of life and reality and biological/ecological thinking; I postulated that: in the future, as this meditative view of life deepens and science clearly assumes it, we will enter into a biological thinking, where there will no longer be a separation between the understanding and the reality of our nature and, therefore, the interface that allows the emergence of biological insight will be established, that is, the stage of final enlightenment will start to occur spontaneously, will be studied and eventually occur to everyone, becoming a natural phase in the path of humans and the founding basis of culture. This transformation will complete the evolutionary mode of life on Earth and initiate another, still unimaginable, for humanity and life.

 

The investigation would end with this point of view, but some time later, somehow, the thesis entered the stage of empirical experience, that is, the biological insight occurred!

​

After all, the interface created in the "Little Mythologies of Creation" was not just a metaphorical prototype. This does not mean that the theses are right, but that they are on the right track and have something real, namely, the mode of relationship and reflection or, biological thinking, seems to have generated this interface between the conscious map and the nature of the universal creative process.

​

The last chapter of the book addresses precisely what happened since 2016, starting by leaving the authentic account of personal insight: how it arose, elapsed and evolved; the aspects undergoing transformation in the initial and later stages, etc.; in particular, it exposes a revelation about the process of incarnation, life after death or eternity, how the evolutionary interdependence between these two sides is dynamized and how this evolution depends essentially on those who are in the incarnation, etc., a revelation that, despite the author's numerous doubts, claims that the reality of the final insight will happen to everyone.

​

Then, we discuss in detail what was clarified in terms of the human condition, as the resolution that we are, embedded in the problem that is the history of life's suffering and the universal evolutionary problematic. We clarify the relational dynamics that operationalizes the human condition in the structure of the outer chakras (presented in an introductory way on the Therapy page), with the details of each chakra, its functions, interdependence circuits, circulation plans (biological, mental, emotional, physical), etc. .

​

Taking into account the entire course of the book, we return to animist insight, to establish a synthesis of history from the point of view of enlightenment, clarifying the ways in which it emerged and evolved through the ages, passing by the complexity of the contexts in evolution and the individual events of enlightenment that, depending on them, have different modes of expression and of being accepted and integrated but, in subtle terms, are the same process and, despite cultures being based on partial views of them and establishing separations, wars , etc., in reality, it is this brotherhood that is subtly behind the dialectic of history, helping us to come to the self-reflection where we can all enter into the final spontaneous resolution.

​

In this sense, despite the doubts and insecurities about how such an achievement could occur in our time, in 2018, the revelation was clarified, "stating" that the event had started in all human beings?!...

 

Did it really happen? Our currente paradigm is the collective interface of enlightenment? How to understand this given the radical dualisms of our time?

​

The end of the book addresses this point of view, taking into account the complexity of the current situation, its implications, in terms of the dynamics between incarnation and eternity and, namely, the fact that we are now a single organism, whose common DNA is the enlightened resolution, which places us in total interdependence, forcing us to look seriously at this evolution, which takes place in the duality of the apocalypse, that is, of revelation/destruction. A duality that we must take to its little mythology, by valuing what is the truth of our humanity and the “destruction” of the remnants of the logics of separation, indifference, alienation and ignorance.

​